Strona Centuriona Krytyka Etyki

Ovation logo HTML5 and Criticism: 3 days after the

Today is the third day of the release logo HTML5. The logo is not here for itself, but for people who will use it. As during the first days of the publication taken?


Graphic design was greeted quite warmly. There's always a slur and can have their (qualifying) the reasons why he did not like the logo (like the ones I mentioned last ). However, when monitoring the reactions of the new logo, we can find a more enthusiastic.

Many people see the logo superman (by accident or intention of the creator?), Which may add to its popularity. For those who like me have not seen without the advice: Five recalls the famous "S" and the orange narrowing the shield is a guide to červenožlutému Supermanovu log.

We find other interpretations. Perhaps the funniest was George Bures Association, which sees in the logo 'trash, which falls into HTML. "

proved to be successful in publishing graphic details under a Creative Commons license, even under the most freest. Completely by the rules, you can create graphics options to suit your site (eg color coded) or as a parody HTML5 beer. Cheers!

importance of logos has been received so far from positive. The original designation "will go under an umbrella logo HTML5 entire open Web platform, including CSS3, SVG, etc." in humans is active in the field of web standards met with resistance landed. A few examples:

• open letter from Web Standard Project
• Throw a man who is in charge of communications at the W3C! from Celik Tanteka
• badge of shame by Jeremy Keith

W3C today responded somewhat diplomatically . Although openly told that the original terms for all surrendered, but modified to promote the logo text including FAQ .

So the original sign disappeared "The logo is a general-purpose visual identity for a broad set of open Web technologies, INCLUDING HTML5, CSS, SVG, Sociology, and others." , instead appeared "This logo Represents HTML5, the cornerstone for modern web applications."

W3C never invoked the original claim, and indeed even impossible, because the proverbial "genie has been removed from the bottle" and the auxiliary icons HTML5 and CSS3 find the logo. However, the W3C at least it will not actively promote a wider perception.

It was a very rational reaction (the W3C tuple). Quick Step, which hindered the basic indignation while letting space for further development and discussion.

From this perspective, the launch of a new logo now appears as success. At some initial disputes over time and, moreover, forget the information, ultimately helping to extend the new logo. If the new logo was from the beginning without a problem, might be such a response, or received no reply.

It seems that the new logo HTML5 will be with us forever (or at least a large part of our professional careers). Reconciled with it and find a way to it. Whether you decide to love or hate.

Free Online Game Johnny The Homicidal Maniac

HTML5 W3C's just got its official logo. And not only against the HTML5

It's true. I do not know how much technology has its official logo. However, for HTML5 to become Buzzword including not only its own technology HTML5 (so, no one to do about it). Therefore descriptive brochure W3C HTML5 HTML5 logo as the logo, but as striking visual identity for the open Web platform , detailed in the article states all-purpose banner for HTML5, CSS, SVG, Sociology, and Other Technologies That constitue an open Web platform .

This is how it looks please:

I'm embarrassed by it. Graphics not understand and therefore leave the analysis povolanějším, but it bothers me a color identity breach. HTML5 has been mostly associated with green (according WHATWG), perhaps with a little blue (according to W3C ). The sense escapes me orange. But it's just force of habit. Current webdesigner the WHATWG knows nothing about the W3C is not interested, so he may have come just the orange.

logo created by Michael Nieling that the reason the logo describes in an interview.

As you're aware, the term HTML5 Has Taken on a Life of ITS own, There Has Been Significant confusion and debate Both Within the developer community and in the public at large, and what exactly it is HTML5 When Used with the term outside of Simply Referring to the spec itself.

And more. The main logo created by Michael and logos of some HTML5 technologies such as online storage, semantics or CSS3.

Note: Do not be surprised is, in a broader sense is now classified under the HTML5 and CSS3, and I repeat - it's that and nobody do about nothing. He's so sometimes I use (and no, not ashamed of it 8-). Now, however, the W3C officially turned to this interpretation, so now is the inclusion of the HTML5 CSS3 completely legitimate. True, the standards organization I was a little surprised. I'm not sure whether it will eventually have their own messes. It is still unclear if the W3C HTML5 says, so it is always really think HTML5. From now on, it can once again think again HTML5 and CSS3. It will be fun. 8-)

on your own website you can generate a picture that includes a list of HTML 5 technologies to use. If not all technologies will look like this (otherwise it would be shorter).



And now the question. You will notice that the icons mean and which should CSS3 semantics? I'm definitely not. Perhaps only multilmédia under the flap of film I could identify. Maybe they want to have some time and eventually you get used to them (icons and logos are the habit), but so far I'm thoroughly confused.

W3C tries to build on this promotional strategy, which formerly used by validators. Just remember how many Valid HTML and CSS valid icons who have ever used (or at least seen). I'm not sure if the time does not move, and whether the injury podoná strategy today, but why not give it a shot.

You can also buy shirts and stickers with the logo .

Note: W3C has long been mired in a lack of funds, which, inter alia, reflected on how well W3C works. Deals with a number of years. Or rather, does not solve much 8-) One of the proposals has a relatively long time is that the W3C has launched some e-shop, which would be an auxiliary source of income. Quietly, I hope that the sale of T-shirts HTML5 this could be a first step. The only thing that unnerves me is the fact that the owner of the domain html5shirt.com the author and not the logo W3C ! I wonder whether that sales of the W3C will have something really - I hope so.

Conclusion: W3C voice is definitely strong as years ago. Sometimes I must speak, it really loud to hear. The creation of this logo (or the set) is actually in a cry: "I still have yet we still breathe. I still create standards, do not forget us."

Think so. And even though the logo (or the whole kit) I have a lot of comments, so in principle this strategy is definitely good and hopefully will be successful.

Other links

• FAQ
  
• references from the creators of the logo
• Interview with creator
• Twitter HTML5 logo
• Open Letter from WaSP
• criticism from Tanteka Celik
• response from the other side